Trump may well be in decent shape, able to enjoy burgers and just gesture the calories away. Everyone's bodies work differently. But if he is, in fact, technically obese, his doctor's unequivocal declaration is, well, totally bogus.

Advertisement

Obesity, the Mayo clinic notes, can lead to a measurably increased likelihood of ailments, including:

Advertisement

In other words, it's a big deal!

But there are also political implications in all of this. Throughout the summer, Trump and his surrogates have mocked Hillary Clinton for imaginary bouts of fatigue, phantom brain injuries, and, most recently, her pneumonia. (While Trump himself offered a fairly restrained response to her latest diagnosis, his allies went to town.) A candidate's supposed measure of physical fitness has become, by Trump's own doing, a legitimate (at least in the eyes of his supporters) cudgel with which to whack at an political opponent.

Advertisement

By focusing his attacks on Clinton's health, while generally deflecting any hint of criticism of his own, Trump enjoys the advantages of being a man for whom questions of fitness have been largely treated as a non-issue, if at all. Clinton, meanwhile, has been subjected to scrutiny about her appearance, health, and fitness to serve in office that ultimately—whether implicitly or explicitly—carries deeply gendered implications.

And, as Politico's Glenn Thrush pointed out, there's no way that the statement from Trump's doctor could ever correspond with Trump's own admission of being overweight—whatever weight that turns out to be.

Advertisement

So where does that leave Donald Trump? Comfortable in his own skin, I hope. Healthy people come in all shapes and sizes. But attacking a political rival on the basis of their supposed physical capabilities, while ignoring potential minefields in one's own, is hypocrisy, and should be called out as such

Advertisement

When it comes to our body politic, anything less would just be unhealthy.