AP

UPDATED 2/28/17 2:52 ET:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said on Tuesday that the Justice Department would "pull back" from the Obama-era strategy of proactively suing police departments for civil rights violations against communities of color.

"We need, so far as we can, to help police departments get better, not diminish their effectiveness. And I'm afraid we've done some of that," Sessions said during a meeting of the nation's state attorneys general, as reported by NBC News. "So we're going to try to pull back on this."

He went on to say that the move would not be "wrong or insensitive to civil rights or human rights."

The people on the other side of the Chicago police force's ā€œpattern or practice of unreasonable force" would likely disagree.

Advertisement

ā€”

On the same day the Justice Department announced it wasĀ doing a 180 on a voting rights case in Texas, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the agency hadn't decided whether or not toĀ impose reforms on the Chicago Police DepartmentĀ even after aĀ damning federal report on its officers' use of excessive force and racist conduct.

As Reuters reported, after the report was released in January, "Chicago and federal officials signed an agreement in principle to create a court-enforced consent decree addressing the issues revealed by the probe." The consent decree, which is essentially a settlement to resolve the issue without the department having to admit guilt, must be negotiated between the two parties and then approved by a federal judge.

Advertisement

Under Obama, the DOJ mandatedĀ 11 law enforcement agencies comply with reforms through consent decrees. But that could change underĀ Sessions, who has criticized the Obama administration's approach to police reform as "troubling"Ā andĀ come out againstĀ the enforcement ofĀ consent decrees in other cases.

Sessions is also, as a general rule, opposed to looking at police violence and misconduct as a systemic issue, instead using the framingĀ of bad apples or rogue officers to minimize the problem of police acting with impunity.

He used that framing asĀ part of his testimony before the SenateĀ during his confirmation hearings:

I think thereā€™s concern that good police officers and good departments can be sued by the Department of Justice when you just have individuals within a department who have done wrong. These lawsuits undermine the respect for police officers and create an impression that the entire department is not doing their work consistent with fidelity to law and fairness.

Advertisement

But this is precisely what the federal report on the Chicago police force concludedā€”that a ā€œpattern or practice of unreasonable forceā€ violated residents' civil rights.

As my colleague Rafi Schwartz wrote at the time, the report, which was prompted by a videoĀ of police shooting and killing 17-year-old Laquan McDonald, also found that misconduct largely went unpunished within the department: ā€œThe City received over 30,000 complaints of police misconduct during the five years preceding our investigation, but fewer than 2% were sustained, resulting in no discipline in 98% of these complaints.ā€

But on Monday, Sessions criticized the DOJ's report as "pretty anecdotal" and "not so scientifically based."

Advertisement

Among those anecdotes are accounts ofĀ Chicago cops opening fire on a residential street at an unarmed man who had been fidgeting with his waistband:

Shooting an unarmed man in the back after a plainclothes officer jumped from an unmarked car and chased after him:

Advertisement

And shooting another unarmed man in the back and accepting an officer's account of the incident despite contradictory video evidence:

"I have not made a decision about [negotiating the consent decree], but I am really worried about Chicago," Sessions said on Monday. But based on his record, the concern may be more for the morale among Chicago's police forceā€“which he also addressed during his Senate confirmation hearingsā€“than residents living under its reign.